You are here
MDL875
Denying summary judgment as there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Defendant is entitled to the government contractor defense. (Fed).
Denying summary judgment in part, where Plaintiff raised an issue of fact as to whether Defendant's asbestos-containing products were a substantial factor in causing his harm; and granting summary judgment in part, where Plaintiff could not i...
Denying summary judgment as there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whethere Defendant's asbestos-containing roofing products were a substantial factor in causing Plaintiff's harm. (E.D. La.).
Denying summary judgment in part, where joint compound contained Defendant's asbestos exclusively; and granting in part, when another joint compound contained asbestos from many manufacturers. (E.D. La.).
Denying summary judgment as there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Defendant's asbestos-containing products substantially caused Plaintiff's injury. (E.D. La.).
Judge Hey's Memorandum and Order partially granting non-party's request for fees and costs associated with the production of documents subpoenaed by Plaintiffs.
Denying summary judgment when, under Florida law, a reasonable juror could conclude that Honeywell valves were a substantial contributing factor to Plaintiff's mesothelioma.
Denying summary judgment when Plaintiff raised a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Defendant was entitled to the government contractor defense.
Denying Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment when Defendant's expert testimony regarding government prohibitions on warnings was not unduly speculative.
Pages
