You are here
MDL875
Applying the heeding presumption under New Jersey law and denying summary judgment on that basis (NJ).
Denying summary judgment on the government contractor defense, as there is a genuine issue of material fact with respect to reasonably precise warnings for military vehicles (Fed).
Summary judgment in favor of defendant denied because under Wisconsin's liberal standard for product identification, a reasonable jury could conclude that plaintiff was exposed to asbestos from defendant's product in connection with one (of t...
Judge Robreno's 11/14/2011 Memorandum Opinion regarding AO 12 in CVLO cases
Denying summary judgment as there is a genuine issue of material fact with respect to the application of the sophisticated user defense in a premises liability claim (PA).
Granting summary judgment because the product line exception does not apply (PA).
Denying summary judgment because Defendant had a duty to warn of the hazards of asbestos-containing brakes incorporated into its vehicles (PA).
Denying summary judgment because there remains a genuine issue of material fact as to the application of Mississippi's learned intermediary defense with respect to the Navy (MS).
Granting summary judgment in favor of various brake pad manufacturers because Pennsylvania law requires product identification evidence with respect to each individual Defendant (PA).
Pages
