You are here
MDL875
Granting Summary Judgment in favor of Defendant because even under FELA's relaxed summary judgment standard, there must be some specific evidence of exposure; it is not enough simply to place both Plaintiff and asbestos at the worksite. (FELA)
Granting partial, but not full, summary judgment in favor of Defendant on the basis that Mississippi follows the two-diease rule, and the statute of limitations periods are separate, regardless of the order of diagnoses. (MS)
Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to Oregon state court because the Court chooses to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the case in the absence of the removing government contractor defendant.
Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to California state court because Defendant's notice of removal under the federal officer removal statute was not timely filed.
Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas because the voluntary rule requires that a voluntary act of plaintiff give rise to diversity jurisdiction; grant of summary judgment in favor of non-diverse defen...
Granting Summary Judgment in favor of Certainteed on Product Identification Grounds. (MS)
Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1) as Plaintiff failed to show excusable neglect.
Granting Summary Judgment in favor of S.O.S. Products Company on Product Identification Grounds (ND).
Granting Summary Judgment in favor of General Electric on the Government Contractor Defense.
Pages
