You are here
MDL875
Granting various Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment because expert testimony was not sworn to, and therefore not admissible under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)(1)(A). (MS)
Denying Honeywell's Motion for Summary Judgment on product identification grounds. (VA)
Granting Summary Judgment in favor of Union Carbide because insufficient evidence that the product at issue was asbestos-containing. (VA)
Granting Summary Judgment in favor of Foster Wheeler because expert testimony alone is insufficient to establish causation. (maritime law)
Denying Summary Judgment under the North Carolina statute of limitations (NC).
Granting Summary Judgment in favor of Goulds Pumps on product identification grounds (NC).
Granting Summary Judgment in favor of Georgia Pacific on product identification grounds (NC).
Memorandum Opinion regarding whether state or maritime law should apply to cases where plaintiff was exposed to asbestos while working on Naval ships.
Denying Summary Judgment on the issue of whether Defendant had undertaken a duty to inspect the premises and did so negligently under Alabama law (AL).
Pages
