Summary judgment granted in favor of defendant on basis of sophisticated user defense under California law, where plaintiff's alleged exposure occurred aboard Navy ships, defendants presented expert testimony that Navy was aware of hazards of... Read more about Summary judgment granted in favor of defendant on basis of sophisticated user defense under California law, where plaintiff's alleged exposure occurred aboard Navy ships, defendants presented expert testimony that Navy was aware of hazards of...
Partial summary judgment granted in favor of defendant on basis of sophisticated user defense under California law, where plaintiff's alleged exposure occurred aboard three (3) Navy ships over the course of three (3) decades, defendants prese... Read more about Partial summary judgment granted in favor of defendant on basis of sophisticated user defense under California law, where plaintiff's alleged exposure occurred aboard three (3) Navy ships over the course of three (3) decades, defendants prese...
Summary judgment denied because genuine issue of material fact existed as to when plaintiff had notice that he may have a cause of action; plaintiff was told of a spot on his lung in November of 2006 as a result of an x-ray for an unrelated i... Read more about Summary judgment denied because genuine issue of material fact existed as to when plaintiff had notice that he may have a cause of action; plaintiff was told of a spot on his lung in November of 2006 as a result of an x-ray for an unrelated i...
Summary judgment in favor of defendant denied because, under Wisconsin's liberal standard for product identification, there was sufficient evidence (primarily in the form of co-worker testimony) from which a reasonable jury could conclude tha... Read more about Summary judgment in favor of defendant denied because, under Wisconsin's liberal standard for product identification, there was sufficient evidence (primarily in the form of co-worker testimony) from which a reasonable jury could conclude tha...
Judge Strawbridge's decision denying certain defendants' motions in limine in an E.D. Pa. case. Read more about Judge Strawbridge's decision denying certain defendants' motions in limine in an E.D. Pa. case.
Judge Hey's opinion granting in part and denying in part various discovery motions. Read more about Judge Hey's opinion granting in part and denying in part various discovery motions.
Judge Hey's opinion granting defendant's motion to compel; plaintiff must produce information regarding other asbestos claims, including against bankruptcy trusts. Read more about Judge Hey's opinion granting defendant's motion to compel; plaintiff must produce information regarding other asbestos claims, including against bankruptcy trusts.
Judge Hey's opinion denying defendant's motion to quash a subpoena. Read more about Judge Hey's opinion denying defendant's motion to quash a subpoena.
Judge Hey's opinion denying denfendat's motion for a protective order and granting in part and denying in part plaintiff's motion to compel. Read more about Judge Hey's opinion denying denfendat's motion for a protective order and granting in part and denying in part plaintiff's motion to compel.
Judge Hey's order regarding defendant's costs of production. Read more about Judge Hey's order regarding defendant's costs of production.