Summary judgment in favor of defendant was denied on grounds of the sophisticated user defense because Defendant failed to identify evidence establishing that Plaintiff was a sophisticated user of the asbestos product at issue, as is required... Read more about Summary judgment in favor of defendant was denied on grounds of the sophisticated user defense because Defendant failed to identify evidence establishing that Plaintiff was a sophisticated user of the asbestos product at issue, as is required...
The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has affirmed the dismissal of certain cases due to failure to comply with AO 12. Read more about The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has affirmed the dismissal of certain cases due to failure to comply with AO 12.
MARDOC: 418 Motions to Dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction were granted; 168 Motions to Dismiss for improper service were denied. Read more about MARDOC: 418 Motions to Dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction were granted; 168 Motions to Dismiss for improper service were denied.
Under New York law, summary judgment granted in favor of Defendant on grounds of insufficient evidence of product identification/causation. Read more about Under New York law, summary judgment granted in favor of Defendant on grounds of insufficient evidence of product identification/causation.
Summary judgment in favor of Defendant was denied because Defendant failed to establish that it did not owe a duty to Decedent regarding take-home exposure, Plaintiff did not have a duty to preserve Dedent's lung tissue, and Plaintiff identif... Read more about Summary judgment in favor of Defendant was denied because Defendant failed to establish that it did not owe a duty to Decedent regarding take-home exposure, Plaintiff did not have a duty to preserve Dedent's lung tissue, and Plaintiff identif...
Summary judgment granted in favor of Defendant on grounds of insufficient evidence of product identification/causation under North Carolina law. Read more about Summary judgment granted in favor of Defendant on grounds of insufficient evidence of product identification/causation under North Carolina law.
Summary judgment granted in favor of Defendant on grounds of insufficient evidence of product identification/causation under North Carolina law. Read more about Summary judgment granted in favor of Defendant on grounds of insufficient evidence of product identification/causation under North Carolina law.
Summary judgment granted in favor of Defendant on grounds of insufficient evidence of product identification/causation under California law. Read more about Summary judgment granted in favor of Defendant on grounds of insufficient evidence of product identification/causation under California law.
Summary judgment granted in favor of Defendant on grounds of insufficient evidence of product identification/causation under California law. Read more about Summary judgment granted in favor of Defendant on grounds of insufficient evidence of product identification/causation under California law.
Summary judgment granted in favor of Defendant on grounds of insufficient evidence of product identification/causation under California law. Read more about Summary judgment granted in favor of Defendant on grounds of insufficient evidence of product identification/causation under California law.