Results for search string "mcqueen"
Query matched 17 files. Now showing files 11 to 17.
  Page 2 of 2.    Pages:   1  [2]  
      

File # 11:15D1066P.pdfSize (bytes): 92427Last Modified: 12/29/2015
Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word Adobe PDF Library 11.0 2015-12-29T09:32:11-05:00 2015-12-29T09:32:11-05:00 2015-12-29T09:32:11-05:00 cole 12.16.15 Katzin Opinion on Motions in Limine;12.22.15 Katzin ORDER on Motions in Limine; 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION : v. : : MICHAEL KATZIN : NO. 11-226-2 : MEMORANDUM Pratter, J. December 22, 2015 I. INTRODUCTION Trial in this matter is currently scheduled to commence on January 8, 2016. Doc. No. 222. Mr. Katzin faces charges for conspiring to engage in pharmacy burglary (Count I), conspiring to possess controlled substances with the intent to distribute (Count II), engaging in pharmacy burglary (Count III), and possessing with intent to distribute controlled substances (Count IV). Before the Court are the Government’s two motions in limine seeking to introduce at trial certain evidence of the Defendant’s prior criminal activity. Doc. Nos. 175 & 192. Also before the Court is the ...

File # 12:09D1019P.PDFSize (bytes): 3892377Last Modified: 08/21/2009
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : : CRIMINAL ACTION v. : : NO. 07–427 DANIEL GARRAUD : SURRICK, J. 19 , 2009 MEMORANDUM Presently before the Court are Defendant Daniel Garraud’s Motion for Judgement [sic] of Acquittal Pursuant to Rule 29 and Motion for a New Trial Pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. (Doc. No. 137.) For the following reasons, the Motions will be denied. I. BACKGROUND On July 25, 2007, a grand jury returned an indictment charging Defendant with armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(d) (Count One) and using or carrying a firearm during a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (Count Two). (Doc. No. 10.) On a jury returned a verdict of guilty against Defendant on both counts. (Doc. No. 126.) On May 22, 2009, Defendant filed the instant motions for post-trial relief.1 (Doc. No. 137.) Defendant challenges the Court’s pre-trial rulings on his suppression application and his ...

File # 13:12D0484P.PDFSize (bytes): 138439Last Modified: 05/11/2012
PrintServer140 Corel PDF Engine Version 1.14.0.755 2012-05-11T13:16:55Z 2012-05-11T13:16:55Z 2012-05-11T13:16:55Z IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES : CRIMINAL ACTION of AMERICA : : v. : : HARRY KATZIN, et al. : No. 11-226 M E M O R A N D U M PRATTER, J. MAY 9, 2012 INTRODUCTION Brothers Harry, Michael, and Mark Katzin, each facing charges of pharmacy burglary under 18 U.S.C. § 2118(b) and possession of Schedule II drugs with intent to distribute under 18 U.S.C. § 2118(b), have moved to suppress evidence obtained as the result of the GPS surveillance of a Dodge Caravan driven by Harry Katzin on the night of the brothers’ arrest. After the brothers filed their motions and the Court held an evidentiary hearing on the matter, the Supreme Court decided United States v. Jones, 132 S. Ct. 945 (2012), and held that the installation and monitoring of a GPS device on a vehicle traveling on public roads constitutes a Fourth Amendment search. As a result, all pa ...

File # 14:09D1045P.PDFSize (bytes): 150737Last Modified: 08/27/2009
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Albertine Thompson, as Parent and : CIVIL ACTION Legal Guardian of Marc Eldemire, and : Aislinn McQueen, as Parent and : Legal Guardian of Anthony and : NaJame McQueen, : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : Stephen Mancuso, Robert Donnelly, and : Zachary Kuzowsky, : Defendants. : NO. 08-3638 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION L. FELIPE RESTREPO AUGUST 25, 2009 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Before the Court is the Motion in limine and supporting Memorandum of Law of Defendants, Stephen Mancuso, Robert Donnelly, and Zachary Kuzowsky, seeking to preclude the admission of any evidence or argument concerning prior Internal Affairs Division (“IAD”) investigations or other police misconduct on their part (Doc. No. 18), and the Memorandum of Law in response thereto of Plaintiffs Albertine Thompson (as parent and guardian of Plaintiff Marc Eldemire) and Aislinn McQueen (as parent and guardian of Plaintiffs Anthony and NaJame McQueen) (Doc. No. 22). Also before the C ...

File # 15:00D0235P.pdfSize (bytes): 92404Last Modified: 02/27/2004
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KIMBERLY A. LANE, and : CIVIL ACTION CHARLOTTE E. MCQUEEN, : individually and on behalf : of her two minor children, : KAREEM JAMAL and JAHLEAR HARRIS : : v. : : JOHN COLE and ROSE COLE : NO. 99-2463 M E M O R A N D U M WALDMAN, J. March 22, 2000 Plaintiffs assert federal claims against defendants under the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq. Plaintiffs Lane and McQueen also assert state law claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress against defendants, and plaintiff Lane asserts state law claims for assault and battery against defendant John Cole. Presently before the court is defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint. Defendants seek dismissal of the Fair Housing Act claims of plaintiff McQueen and on behalf of Jamal and Harris, and dismissal of the intentional infliction of emotional distress claims of plaintiffs Lane and McQueen. Defendants contend that only plaintiff Lane has standing ...

File # 16:15D0548P.pdfSize (bytes): 224834Last Modified: 06/24/2015
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WILLARD E. BARTEL, Adm’r for : CONSOLIDATED UNDER JAMES T. MCQUEEN, Deceased, : MDL 875 : Plaintiff, : : v. : : CHARLES KURZ & COMPANY INC., : et al., : : E.D. Pa. Civil Action No. Defendants. : 2:11-cv-30511-ER M E M O R A N D U M EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J. June 22, 2015 This case was transferred in January 2011 from the United State District Court for the Northern District of Ohio to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, where it became part of the consolidated asbestos products liability multidistrict litigation (MDL 875). The case was assigned to the Court’s maritime docket (“MARDOC”). Willard E. Bartel (“Plaintiff”), Administrator of the Estate of James T. McQueen, alleges that James McQueen (“Decedent” or “Mr. McQueen”) was exposed to asbestos while working aboard various ships. Plaintiff asserts that Decedent developed an asbestosrelated illness as a result of his exposure to asbestos aboard th ...

File # 17:11D1237P.PDFSize (bytes): 87250Last Modified: 11/04/2011
1 The following facts are based on the testimony of Tyrone Jenkins and FBI Special Agent Steven McQueen at the August 2, 2011, hearing on Smith’s suppression motion and the exhibits introduced at the hearing. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION : v. : No. 10-489-2 : AARON SMITH : MEMORANDUM Juan R. Sánchez, J. November 3, 2011 Defendant Aaron Smith is charged with several offenses based on his alleged involvement in an armed robbery of the Fox & Hound Smokehouse & Tavern (Tavern) in Philadelphia on October 27, 2008. Smith asks this Court to suppress (1) his out-of-court photographic identification by witness Tyrone Jenkins in February 2011, and (2) any in-court identification of him by Jenkins or the other two Tavern employees who were present at the time of the robbery, Valynn Barfield and Leonard Lowe. The Government does not oppose Smith’s motion as to Barfield and Lowe, from whom it does not intend to elicit an identificat ...

Query matched 17 files. Now showing files 11 to 17.
  Page 2 of 2.    Pages:   1  [2]  
      

Search Form
Search string (100 characters max.): 
Search scope: 
Advanced Search
      
Please read the Search Tips before searching.